Year of the Ox Chinese New Year has just passed, and add milk特仑苏on much hubbub of the OMP, I received 78 media requests. Reporters ask: OMP what? It harmful? It whole? How much is it to add volume?
I said: sorry, OMP is not a precise scientific terms, are self-made business out of the word. At the Ministry of Health did not release test results, businesses do not themselves provide an accurate statement, I can not give you any answer. I did not investigate, and there is no right to speak.
At present, relevant experts have been saying give the regulatory department has also been give conclusions, do not have to go to discuss whether the product is harmful to the question. However, the case exposed by the food and health claims that question mark should not therefore ends.
In fact, a year ago, many people asked "OMP What is" the problem and ask me: you buy OMP add do not buy the milk? My answer: do not buy.
Why? They asked.
I thought that way. First of all, for the food, the consumer should have the right to know. Apart from natural food ingredients, if you add other ingredients, should inform consumers. Should not only inform its legal name, it should also be informed of its content or content range. For example, add one of a kind of pigment, then the required tags on what kind of note in the end, rather than simply write "pigment." The scope of its content are how much, from food additives can be found on the use of standard, more than the scope is illegal. Promulgated in accordance with our country last year, food nutrition labeling regulations, food, if that adds some nutrients, it must also want to inform what it is material, the content is.
If a product publicity, said one of vigorously add vitamin A, but did not say how much, how do you watch? If you add too much, may cause toxic reactions, unsafe. If you add too little and thus fail to nutritional effects, are not蒙人? Therefore, this product, simply can not buy.
listening to this, we all nodded his head. However, OMP is not a vitamin, ah, ah it is the active ingredient. They asked.
me, that it is because the active ingredients are, even more peace of mind. What is the active ingredient in the end? It's神神秘秘, even the experts refuse to tell,弄个inexplicable abbreviations to deal with the public, this is the lack of respect for the consumer's right to know. Why do we eat a dictionary of biochemistry are even can not find out, even the experts are not sure of suspicious example? Surprisingly also for the many components of such a suspicious money, it is incredible!
everybody agree, but many people still believe that now that add to food products, must be some good things. - normal people listen to "X factor" such as cloud cover fog cover vocabulary and listen more, and is already very accustomed to the speculation of the status of the犯晕vocabulary.
me that question is that it tell you at the packaging on how much you add? Add up the number of patent Say no use, packaging promises add up how much it important. Obviously, such material does not belong to day-to-day added to the nutrient composition of foods. Extra in case of such substances have side effects how to do?
again On the contrary, it is probably a good thing, but businesses inside did not add, or add the amount of very small no effect, and who will supervise it? Now that there is no security, why should you buy it?
management from the perspective of laws and regulations, if a product health claims, such as bone, then it must declare health food products. If it does not have the batch number of health food products, on the role of unauthorized health claims, it is illegal! However, this product really does not have any health food batch.
so, this mysterious material in the end what is safe, or minor problem (now the conclusions have already come out, it does not by cancer risk). Should be most concerned about our food products are exposed in the management of the tremendous vulnerability - be able to permit a self-made business name, even the experts are saying that is not clear what the "active ingredient" milk add this great noodle consumption Canton of food products, after Do not need approval, do not need to publish their real composition, Marking Products Do not need in the real components, and does not require specific content tagging ... ...
If the management problems are not resolved today with OMP, perhaps tomorrow will be out of food in the EMP, UMP and other baffling terms.
consumers have a right to know in the end they ate anything. In particular to food to add extra things. Food additives have to understand that even marked out a significant physiological activity of the biochemical composition can it be ambiguous? If so, can only be used to describe a word: terrible!
few days ago, a well-known anti-counterfeiting Wang prosecute people Coca-Cola Company, because cola drinks contain caffeine, but not in the packaging label on content, but also not suitable for children without prompting drinking beverages that contain caffeine. Coca-Cola feels aggrieved, but from a consumer perspective, there is the number of parents are aware of cola which contain caffeine, may cause a child addicted to it? How many parents know that one of the phosphate absorption of minerals, however disadvantages?
It appears that our country's food labeling and health claims, from the no legal basis to have law, have a good long way to go ah. To really improve food quality and safety, in a sense, the U.S. consumer, we should also learn study Wang, strengthen human rights awareness. Each note is a ballot paper - Although there is no law enforcement power, at least money in our own hands, those who do not behave dishonestly products, we can not cast its votes.
No comments:
Post a Comment