at Red duck after exposure, it is once again put forward such a question; question why food safety has always been the first to discover journalist, rather than regulators first found it? Food hygiene supervision agencies, what use?
not really answer this question. Although I am not a health inspection personnel, but after countless friends asked, as a food to people in the trade, are also touched.
a friend of mine asked me: Why do almost every time the incidence of crime are found nearby residents or their relatives and friends, rather than public security officials first discovered it? Public security personnel have means of preventing such crimes happen?
friend shook his head: Law enforcement officers can only happen in case after case go. Criminals in the world so much, they have 11 eyes any way, not the case happen?
I nodded: Yes. So many food producers, anything to the people so much, how can you even less than the police have much more oversight of food hygiene to prevent food safety personnel case happen?
friend thought, nodded reluctantly. But she went on to say: In that case, food quality inspection institutions can detect a variety of toxic substances have put search again ah!
I asked: The world already has on millions of synthetic chemical substances, you are not bad people fake traders, dream, it can not think what Tim food new toxic substances ah! Supervisory staff are found only after the problem, only add a new poison Detected projects. Detect a project fee, at least tens of dollars, many are several hundred dollars; if the countless species that may arise, like a needle in a haystack detect poison again, not to say impossible to achieve the goal of human and material resources, time and management could not ah! Food on the market so much, If this country to do, we will definitely spend a lot of funding, food prices will also increase the burden would be much heavier you are.
This time, a friend has no choice but to sigh: It appears that the pipe is really no way.
me to comfort her, saying: food safety must be a good question up. You now see many problems, because we are now exposed by the media ground, and people's safety awareness high, the management of a more stringent. If the current standard requirements, our small, food or much safer it! At that time, even a few dozen die case, apart from laymen, people simply do not know, everyone fearless ignorance, equanimity and restraint.
For example, people are using old newspapers packaged food, while the ink on newspapers contain carcinogens. People often eat for a few years ago put the pork and grain. It is deep-fried deep-fried dough sticks Serratula cake, alum is released by the experience of go, no one to check whether or not excessive. Also, for example, people used to give candy snacks dyeing synthetic pigment and saccharin, the number of people have no control, popsicles in the saccharin hair often more bitter. I remember in 1992, I determined to do with students and found a fruit market in sulfur dioxide standards are actually 1000 times! At that time, did not the media go tube.
Friend finally showed a glimmer of a smile: so that the time is still progress.
I said: What is crime prevention? Usually there is three ways: First, put the law to inform the world so that people are aware of the consequences after the crime, so most people dare not act rashly; put two ordinary people are mobilized to allow everyone to report crime are actively clues, or supervision of those who have possible crime, so that they have clear evidence; three are doing a good job in social harmony, so that everyone can rely on a good day to work on law-abiding Ben.
for food safety, the reason is the same. First of all, to formulate laws and regulations, food safety laws and regulations to impose significant penalties for the producer, so that they are property on the heavy fines under the Criminal Code punished. In this way, to the food adulteration使坏when you心惊肉跳. And want to set up a prize-winning reporting mechanism, so that people know to report the existence of possible criminal acts. Finally, I had to set up norms of market mechanisms and testing sampling system for high quality food prices, access to consumer's identity, receive higher benefits; to formulate Product traceability system so that poor-quality food can be found active, duty clearly, can not fish in troubled waters, to avoid liability.
Friend said: a prize-winning reports can be really smart way!
I said: Yes ah! In fact, these food safety incidents have been revealed by the reporter is indicative of the masses are reported to have a role to play. Supervision department of human and material resources are limited, and information channels is also limited; however, the energy of the broad masses of people are unlimited, industry-related information is also unlimited. As long as this policy will be institutionalized, to make full use of incentive mechanisms, it will naturally someone will find out at the use of intelligence-doped fake, shoddy products, toxic substances such as illegal add on illegal activities. As long as everyone supervision, and all reported social atmosphere, coupled with stringent regulations and frequent spot checks and investigate and deal with highly efficient, the food safety environment will gradually improve.
Friend nodded approvingly and added: can be investigated and dealt with efficiently, must be able to report correct, which depends on the supervision and law enforcement department of the efficiency of the ... this regard, I am afraid that reporters would also like to go promote click.
I agree with this view. Have experienced a case of bacterial food poisoning, the want to report to the health and epidemic prevention stations, one procedural question, it was decided to give up. According to the requirements, first of all want to stay frozen samples for future reference; would also like to spend their own money effortlessly samples tested get their results, then go to report in accordance with the results ... so, my idle fees and charges Detected by whom paid, and yet this argument. Convenience of course, reporter, television money so that they can do it everything. Which is really very difficult for ordinary people, only as far as possible a self-protection.
Finally I asked her: are you duck before the election how election?
she embarrassed Answer: I am Red duck ... enjoy watching ... which felt nice.
me laughed: Ha ha. Aesthetic point of view by the selection of food, usually will be cheated.粉条bleaching, dyeing tzu green, yellow dyed chestnut, red ... ... the duck is not good for you by it? Natural food has probably so beautiful it?
Friend said: What are natural, I do not have seen, nor produced, where分得清.
I said: yes. This is the crux of it. It appears that after the whole of society must step up food and education to make the children from an early age to see food production and the production process, to know what foods are natural, normal, in order to strengthen the boycott of the ability to distinguish inferior products. If consumers do not like the food coloring, natural dye will not had someone go.
Friend said: ah, now I realized. To expect the food supervision department, there is no way to solve all problems. Light complain also no use, it is better to select those of the status of natural food, there is safety-certified food, resist staining foods. This table can be the basic guarantee of safety.
information link:
According to Chutian Dushi Bao reported that the November 15, Wuhan City Mayor's office, through the principle of "the city of Wuhan to report the manufacture and sale of fake and shoddy food meritorious staff incentives (Exposure Draft) ", food reported range of supermarkets, shopping malls, hotels and other places the quality of the food problem; illegal dens and food processing enterprises; livestock and poultry, seafood and other quality problems;私屠滥宰live pigs and so on. Government departments will be kept strictly confidential whistle-blowers, the specific rules also revise the incentives, it is said the highest reward of up to 40,000 yuan.
No comments:
Post a Comment